Hong Hye-geol’s safety advice about Jeju recently drew attention alongside news related to disappearances.
But should one person’s lived experience be read as an assessment of public safety across all of Jeju?
This controversy illustrates the distance between cautioning people about secluded roads and declaring an entire region dangerous.
3-line summary
1. Hong Hye-geol urged caution about walking alone
2. He said people should not let their guard down even in broad daylight or on paved roads
3. This should not be taken as a conclusion that all of Jeju is dangerous
Advice on the 24th and an Apology on the 25th
On the 24th, Hong Hye-geol posted on social media that he did not recommend going around Jeju alone. According to reports, he wrote that riding a bicycle around Jeju can lead people onto roads with few people, and that even slightly straying from an oreum or an Olle Trail can leave them in places where it is difficult to ask for help.
He said he would not recommend going around alone simply because it is broad daylight or a paved road. His position was that the same caution is needed not only for women but also for physically fit men. This was personal safety advice based on the characteristics of the terrain and travel routes he has experienced while living in Jeju for seven years.
Reactions were divided. Some agreed that people should be careful in secluded places regardless of gender, while others criticized the remarks for potentially making all of Jeju appear dangerous. The concern was that statements about safety could spread into anxiety about the region.
After the controversy, Hong explained on the 25th that the intent of his post was to say “let’s be careful,” not that Jeju is dangerous. While apologizing to those hurt by the post, he also said that he considers Jeju an attractive place. Both his initial advice and his subsequent explanation should be viewed as Hong’s own statements and positions.
The Risk of Secluded Roads Is Different From a Judgment About Jeju
Hong cited Jeju’s mountainous terrain and the characteristics of its roads. He explained that walking wherever one’s feet take them can lead to isolated places, where people may encounter risks such as getting lost or attacks by feral dogs, even if no crime is involved. He also mentioned the example of people taking a side path from the Olle Trail in Hallim and becoming lost near vacant houses or abandoned factories.
What matters here is the scope of the statement. “Do not walk alone in secluded places” is a behavioral guideline that can be applied when traveling or taking a walk. By contrast, “Jeju is dangerous” is a claim judging the safety level of the entire region. The two statements are not the same.
It is true that recent disappearance cases in Jeju have drawn attention, but the reports provided do not allow the circumstances of each case or public safety across Jeju as a whole to be grouped into a single conclusion. Some reports said that procedures were underway to confirm the identity of a person who was found and the cause of death. Interpretations linking matters still awaiting confirmation to crime or a series of incidents should be avoided.
The key point to note is place and situation. Being a tourist destination does not mean every road is safe, nor does it mean an entire region is dangerous. The situation itself—where people disappear from view sooner than expected on an unfamiliar road—is what should be assessed for safety.
What Travelers Need Is Route Planning, Not Fear
If you plan to walk alone, it is better first to consider whether there is any reason to leave the designated trail. Hong’s explanation that stepping onto a side path out of curiosity can make it difficult to retrace your steps is advice closer to route management than exaggerated fear.
Before setting out, it can also help to tell companions your destination and expected return time, and on unfamiliar roads, to make a habit of being aware of the direction where other people are present. However, this preparation does not mean these are special rules needed only in a particular region. They are basic safety practices that can apply to anyone in an unfamiliar place.
There is no need to begin by making a judgment about Jeju based on Hong Hye-geol’s remarks. The core of his remarks is the need for caution when the conditions of being alone and being on a secluded road overlap. Take the safety advice on board, but it is more accurate not to define a region and its people with the single word danger.
Standards for Reading Future Announcements
News related to Hong Hye-geol is difficult to conclude based on a single figure or sentence alone. The meaning becomes clearer when you distinguish who made the announcement, whether the statement concerns something already implemented or a future plan, and whether the target and timing are specifically presented.
Even within the same material, explanations of need, discussions, implementation plans, and actual implementation may be different stages. Even if the scale of an announcement appears large, it is necessary to check together what it applies to and what procedures remain in order to avoid overstating or understating the current situation.
In future news, compare whether a new announcement repeats existing content or whether the target, schedule, or implementation status has actually changed. Reviewing the original articles listed in the references can also help identify differences in wording that may be easy to miss from headlines alone.
References
Tags #HongHyegeol #LivingInJeju #JejuSafety #JejuTravel #SoloTravel #JejuOlleTrail #OreumTravel #SecludedRoadsInJeju #TravelSafety #TravelPrecautions #JejuDisappearanceCases #JejuTourism #JejuIslandTravel