What circumstances led to the scene in which Alisson Becker kicked the electronic substitution board after the match?
Liverpool fell behind twice against Nottingham Forest before drawing 2-2.
Although this was a keyword observed in the Indonesian search market, it does not indicate the match location.
3-line summary
1. Alisson was reported to have damaged the substitution board by kicking it
2. The Liverpool–Forest match ended 2-2
3. Claims about equipment delays and the refereeing decision should be distinguished
The situation in which three substitutions stopped in the 67th minute
According to CNN Indonesia, Liverpool played Nottingham Forest at Anfield on August 29. In the 67th minute, Liverpool attempted to substitute three players at once, and the information about the incoming players had reportedly been delivered to match officials several minutes earlier. However, Liverpool’s explanation was that a technical problem occurred with the electronic substitution board used by fourth official Tim Robinson, so the procedure did not proceed immediately.
Liverpool said it had submitted the information about the players to be substituted approximately 2~3 minutes before the incident. Manager Andoni Iraola then expressed frustration to the effect that, despite another stoppage in play, the substitutions still did not take place. This was an explanation concerning the claim that preparations for the substitutions had been completed and the equipment delay; it was not presented as a final conclusion officially acknowledged by a match official.
Meanwhile, in the penalty area, Liverpool’s Brazilian goalkeeper Alisson Becker brought down Nottingham Forest’s Neco Williams, and the referee awarded a penalty. Morgan Gibbs-White converted the penalty, putting the visiting team ahead 2-1. Liverpool eventually caught up, but frustration remained that the team had to wait with the substitutions ready to be made.
It is better not to mix two separate facts at this point. The penalty was awarded and led to a goal; that is an actual match result. By contrast, the claim that the substitution would have happened sooner if the equipment had been working properly, and that subsequent scenes might therefore have been different, is Liverpool’s claim. That claim does not necessarily mean the penalty decision itself was incorrect.
Alisson kicked the substitution board while heading toward the tunnel
After the match, Alisson was reported to have damaged the digital substitution board by kicking it as he headed toward the stadium tunnel. CNN Indonesia reported that related footage had spread on social media. The report mentioned the possibility that he was disappointed by the substitution board’s technical problem, but it did not present any statement in which Alisson himself explained the reason for his action.
Therefore, there is insufficient basis to determine Alisson’s exact feelings about the incident. What has been confirmed is that there was a substitution-delay controversy during the match and that Alisson was reported to have kicked the substitution board afterward. The possibility that he was protesting the equipment problem is not the same as knowing his precise personal state of mind.
Former English Premier League referee Graham Scott also offered an opinion to the effect that the equipment had a problem and required evaluation. He suggested that, if the issue continued, possible alternatives would include discontinuing the equipment’s use, entrusting the operation of the substitution board to the clubs, or displaying substitution information on the digital advertising boards around the edge of the pitch.
However, these were Scott’s suggestions. The reports provided contain no announcement that the operation of electronic substitution boards changed after this match or that any particular alternative was adopted. Opinions pointing out equipment malfunctions should be distinguished from an actual institutional change.
A 2-2 draw after twice coming from behind—the match was not defined by the substitution board alone
detiksport and Goal.com did not explain this match solely through the substitution-board controversy. Nottingham Forest took the lead twice through a goal by Dan Ndoye and Gibbs-White’s penalty. Liverpool avoided defeat by equalizing through goals from Alexander Isak and Victor Muñoz, respectively.
Goal.com reported that Liverpool recorded 69% possession but had only four shots on target. Although the home team held the ball for long periods, it struggled against the visiting team’s physical contests and only drew level after conceding twice. Oliver Glasner, who led Forest, said he was proud of the team’s performance and chance creation but disappointed that it had failed to win.
Former Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard said on TNT Sports that the team was too gentle and needed more tackles and victories in duels. While saying that the frustration caused by the substitution delay was understandable, he spoke to the effect that it was not a bigger problem than the goals conceded that could have been avoided. This was Gerrard’s interpretation of the match, not the official conclusion of the game.
Viewed only through Alisson’s action, the incident may appear to be a moment of anger. However, the sequence reported was the claim of a substitution delay, the penalty concession, and the 2-2 draw after twice coming from behind. To understand the match, the protest concerning the equipment problem and the criticism of Liverpool’s defending and physical contests should be considered separately.
References
Tags #알리송베케르 #AlissonBecker #리버풀 #노팅엄포리스트 #프리미어리그 #안필드 #전자교체판 #교체지연 #페널티킥 #2대2무승부 #빅토르무뇨스 #스티븐제라드