한국어

Could Live Text Voting, Worth 30%, Reverse the Rankings?

Could Live Text Voting, Worth 30%, Reverse the Rankings?
Could Live Text Voting, Worth 30%, Reverse the Rankings?

When watching the finale of a competition program, it is easy to feel anxious. It can seem as though voting now might change the outcome.

But the share those votes account for in the total is decided in advance.

Looking at the scoring breakdown first changes how you watch a finale.

Three-line summary
1. The *Active King of Singers 3* finale was scored by combining four categories.
2. Earlier rounds accounted for 60%, and live text voting for 30%.
3. The extent to which same-day votes can reverse the result is predetermined.

Final scores have four components

The scores for the second round of the finale of MBN's *Active King of Singers 3* were structured as follows.

CategoryWeight
Main competition rounds 1 and 2 scores60%
Live text voting30%
Public support voting6%
New song digital music score4%

At a glance, 30% for text voting may look substantial. But the key point of this table is that it sits alongside 60%.

The 60% comes from competition that has already ended

By the time contestants take the finale stage, more than half of their score has already been determined. That is because the scores they received in earlier rounds carry over.

There is a reason for this design. If the result were decided by the finale performance alone, months of competition would be erased in a single day. Those who performed well in earlier episodes and those who did not would begin from the same position.

At the same time, it has a side effect. If the gap built earlier is large, the rankings are unlikely to change regardless of what happens that day. Viewers may vote enthusiastically, only to see the expected result.

These ratios differ across competition programs. The ratio itself answers what the production team has chosen to value more.

What the 30% actually does

The role of live voting is closer to deciding narrow gaps than overturning the rankings.

If the leading contestants are tightly grouped after earlier rounds, 30% can be decisive. Conversely, if first place has a large lead, the same 30% cannot affect the rankings.

That is why there is no fixed answer to the question, “How important is voting?” It depends on how narrow the gap among the leaders is that day.

The final scores in this finale were as follows.

RankScore
1st3,727 points
2nd3,402.22 points
3rd3,280.79 points

The gap between first and second place was 324.78 points. The decimal places appear because vote counts were not used directly; they were converted into a predetermined point allocation.

Why votes become points

There is also a reason vote counts are not simply added as they are.

It is impossible to know in advance how many text votes will come in. Participation varies widely by episode, and far more votes tend to arrive for a finale than usual. If votes were used directly as points, the weight of this category would expand or shrink arbitrarily depending on how many people voted that day.

That is why votes are converted into a predetermined point allocation. The total points corresponding to 30% are set first, and each contestant receives a share based on the proportion of votes they received.

This means that whether many or few votes are cast, this category still accounts for 30%. The decimal places in final scores also result from this division.

Put differently, scores are determined by what percentage of all votes a contestant received, rather than how many votes they received. Even if one person receives many votes, the score gap does not widen if others also receive many votes.

Why is there a remaining 10%?

The 6% public support vote and 4% new song digital music score may appear small, but they have a different character.

While the first two are scores created within the broadcast, these two bring activity outside the broadcast into the scoring: support votes accumulated throughout the broadcast period and actual digital music performance.

This makes sense when viewed as a contest to select people who will continue their activities after the competition ends. It is a mechanism for distinguishing between those who perform well only on stage and those who generate a response outside the stage as well.

Why the broadcast runs past midnight

*Active King of Singers 3* was a 12-episode program that aired every Tuesday from December 23, 2025, through March 10, 2026. It was scheduled to begin at 10 p.m. and end at 12:40 a.m. the following day.

Competition programs run this late because live voting is involved. After showing all the performances, they must open voting, close it, tally the results, and announce them. This entire process is included in the broadcast.

For important episodes, the schedule was sometimes expanded by moving the start time earlier.


When there is disagreement over competition results, people are usually discussing them without looking at the scoring breakdown.

Who performed well and who was designed to win are different questions. The answer to the latter is already disclosed before the broadcast begins.


References